|
by Jeni Williams,
Planet 165
It was very quiet
in Aberystwyth Arts Centre on Easter Saturday and, apart from
the attendant, the exhibition space there was empty. I had
gone to see The Black Cot, the exhibition of Shani Rhys James’s
latest work, and in the silence of the deserted gallery the
sheer scale, colour and unspoken drama of the pictures resonated
with an extraordinary intensity. The abrupt, evocative title
points to Rhys James’s ongoing fascination with the
dark cradle of the family. The word cot may suggest the nursery
but Rhys James’s nursery is not the comfortable, padded
refuge, filled with soft toys and soft furnishings, that is
idealised at every level in our alienated culture. Her black
metal cots look like cages, like hospital cots, or the bare
minimum provided for refugees, their impermanence emphasised
by small wheels. These harsh interiors are populated by alien-faced
children, as solid and as driven as the masculine space of
the public world against which the security of the home has
traditionally been defined. Rhys James takes the matter of
the family romance with a seriousness as great as that of
Freud and, like him, sees it as a place of secrets. Her bedrooms
are haunted by watchful occupants, their flesh raw with the
repressed emotions that leak out in thick scorch marks of
red paint.

Black Cot II from the exhibition The Cradle
of Flesh.
The fact that each
of these flayed subjects, even the children, has the look
of Rhys James herself gives the picture a surreal intensity,
as if the self is falling into pieces. The impression is reinforced
by the inclusion in the new show of five self-portrait heads
of the kind she produced for her 1997 Oriel Mostyn exhibition,
Facing the Self. These small images, 25 x 20 cms, are both
intensely individual in their style (the marvellous mobility
of the paint) and generic in that they replicate the sense
of unease and chaotic uncertainty that lies inescapably within
us all. Rhys James’s underworld nursery is perhaps,
after all, as familiar as the sweeter, sunlit version we more
readily take for reality.

Bed
and Wallpaper, 210 x 210 cms, oil on canvas.
Questions about
the nature of reality and the associated issue of its representation
haunt contemporary painting. The genius of European painters
has long rested on their ability to construct illusions of
a material reality; they painted ideal landscapes as if real,
skilfully mimicked the effects of velvet, silk, lace, skin,
hair; of bone, of water, of fire. But in the wake of the invention
of photography, such imitation may appear outmoded. Many modern
artists engage overtly with the camera and its domination
of material representation: the photographic self-portraits
of Cindy Sherman, for example, caught momentarily in “stills”,
explore the malleability of the self in society, while Jeff
Koons employs advertising clichés to dramatise the
commodification of desire in his recent garish images of floating
doughnuts and melting chocolate bars. We live in a “post
media” age in which painting itself is only one option
amongst many and painting devoted to the figure in particular
is increasingly replaced by abstract and conceptual work.
And yet the figurative work of Rhys James, like that of Bacon
or Freud or, to mention another female artist, Kahlo, continues
to fascinate and disturb its viewers. Each explores the problematic
nature of representation itself, and their shared modern subject
— the dissolving, mutating self of both artist and viewer
— is the very opposite of the Enlightenment self and
the dream of realism it generated.
|